<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>D.T. Stephenson &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dtstephenson.com/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dtstephenson.com</link>
	<description>Photography and Image Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:56:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Whigs</title>
		<link>http://dtstephenson.com/2010/04/17/the-whigs/</link>
		<comments>http://dtstephenson.com/2010/04/17/the-whigs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dtstephenson.com/?p=184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Predecessors to the Modern Republicans
&#8220;The Whigs&#8221;
I just want to highlight a little bit about the history of the Republican party so people can better understand where their origins lie, the Whig party.

Excerpts taken from Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whig_Party_%28United_States%29
This name was chosen to echo the American  Whigs of 1776, who  fought for independence, and because &#8220;Whig&#8221; was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><strong>Predecessors to the Modern Republicans</strong></h2>
<p>&#8220;The Whigs&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>I just want to highlight a little bit about the history of the Republican party so people can better understand where their origins lie, the Whig party.<br />
</strong></p>
<p>Excerpts taken from Wikipedia</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whig_Party_%28United_States%29" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whig_Party_%28United_States%29</a></p>
<p>This name was chosen to echo the <a title="Patriot (American  Revolution)" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriot_%28American_Revolution%29">American  Whigs</a> of 1776, who  fought for independence, and because &#8220;Whig&#8221; was  then a widely recognized  label of choice for people who saw themselves  as opposing <a title="Autocracy" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autocracy">autocratic  rule</a>.</p>
<p><strong>If you go by their name it seems from the start the party had chosen an image that was contrary to their implied opposition to Aristocratic rule.  As better  explained by the paragraph that follows. </strong></p>
<p>The Whigs, also known as the &#8220;white heads&#8221;, won votes in every  socio-economic category, but appealed more to the professional and  business classes: doctors, lawyers, merchants, ministers, bankers,  storekeepers, factory owners, commercially-oriented farmers and  large-scale planters. In general, commercial and manufacturing towns and  cities voted Whig, save for strongly Democratic precincts in Irish  Catholic and German immigrant communities; the Democrats often sharpened  their appeal to the poor by ridiculing the Whigs&#8217; aristocratic  pretensions.</p>
<p><strong>We now go to a bit of their beliefs about how the country should be governed:</strong></p>
<p>The Whigs came to unite around economic policy, celebrating Clay&#8217;s  vision of the &#8220;<a title="American System (economic plan)" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_System_%28economic_plan%29">American System</a>&#8221; which  favored government support for a more modern, industrial economy in  which education and commerce would equal physical labor or land  ownership as a means of productive wealth.</p>
<p><strong>I would like to add that modernization is not a bad thing. Many of their ideas in moderation are perfectly acceptable. </strong></p>
<p>By contrast, the <a title="History of the United States Democratic Party" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_United_States_Democratic_Party">Democrats</a> hearkened to the <a title="Jeffersonian political philosophy" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffersonian_political_philosophy">Jeffersonian political  philosophy</a> ideal of an egalitarian agricultural society, advising  that traditional farm life bred republican simplicity, while  modernization threatened to create a politically powerful caste of rich <a title="Aristocracy" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristocracy">aristocrats</a> who threatened to subvert democracy.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whig_Party_%28United_States%29" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whig_Party_%28United_States%29</a></p>
<p><strong>I&#8217;ve included some quotes from Thomas Jefferson I found on website that detailed the &#8220;Jeffersonian Philosophy&#8221; that the Whigs opposed.  Seems to me that a lot of the problems that have arisen today would not exist if we could have heeded many of the ideas of Thomas Jefferson.  History gives us the ability to look at things on a much larger prospective than the analyzing the present. In retrospect you can see the parts as a whole rather than in small pieces. </strong></p>
<p><strong>I suppose my overall point is to examine the basic ideologies and attitudes of the Whig party in comparison with the Republican party we know today.  A party ruled by deception and philosophies that benefit no one but their own. (my opinion) This has lead to a dramatic contrast between the wealthy and the impoverished that we see today, as displayed by the link posted below. Allowing  for the wealthy to control almost every aspect of the common man&#8217;s life. In one of my opinions, one of the very reasons this country was formed, to break away from the monarchy and aristocratic rule.<br />
</strong></p>
<h3><a href="http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html">The Wealth Distribution</a></h3>
<p>In the United States, wealth is highly concentrated in a relatively  few hands. As of 2007, the top 1% of households (the upper class) owned  34.6% of all privately held wealth, and the next 19% (the managerial,  professional, and small business stratum) had 50.5%, which means that  just 20% of the people owned a remarkable 85%, leaving only 15% of the  wealth for the bottom 80% (wage and salary workers). In terms of  financial wealth (total net worth minus the value of one&#8217;s home), the  top 1% of households had an even greater share: 42.7%.</p>
<p><strong>Thomas Jefferson Quotes<br />
</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>Banks I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous  to our liberties than standing armies. Already they  have raised up a moneyed aristocracy that has set  the Government at defiance. The issuing power should  be taken from the banks and restored to the people to  whom it properly belongs.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>If the American people ever allow private banks to  control the issue of their money, first by inflation  and then by deflation, the banks and corporations  that will grow up around them (around the banks),  will deprive the people of their property until their  children will wake up homeless on the continent  their fathers conquered.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>The system of banking [is] a blot left in all our  Constitutions, which, if not covered, will end in their  destruction&#8230; I sincerely believe that banking  institutions are more dangerous than standing  armies; and that the principle of spending money  to be paid by posterity &#8230; is but swindling futurity on a large scale.    Thomas Jefferson</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on  this ground that &#8216;all powers not delegated to the United  States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the  states, are preserved to the states or to the people.&#8217;  &#8230; To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially  drawn around the powers of Congress is to take possession  of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible of any  definition. The incorporation of a bank, and the powers assumed  by this bill (chartering the first Bank of the United States),  have not, been delegated to the United States by the Constitution.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dtstephenson.com/2010/04/17/the-whigs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>r3&#215;4yaf8mq</title>
		<link>http://dtstephenson.com/2009/07/05/r3x4yaf8mq/</link>
		<comments>http://dtstephenson.com/2009/07/05/r3x4yaf8mq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 22:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dtstephenson.com/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[r3&#215;4yaf8mq
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>r3&#215;4yaf8mq</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dtstephenson.com/2009/07/05/r3x4yaf8mq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
